Patel Testifies Before Senate Appropriations on the FBI's 2026 Budget, May 8, 2025
May 8, 2025 · CBS News · 1:58:15
Embedded from the source channel — never re-uploaded. Watch on YouTube
What happened
FBI Director Kash Patel testified on May 8, 2025, before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies on the Bureau’s fiscal 2026 budget request, carried in full by CBS News. The hearing was the second half of a two-day budget pair — and the contrast with the first half was the story. The administration’s proposal called for cutting the FBI by about $545 million; testifying to the House subcommittee the day before, Patel had broken with it, saying the Bureau needed “more than what has been proposed,” that his own proposed budget was $11.1 billion and would cut no positions, and that the proposed levels would force cuts of roughly 1,300 employees. Before the Senate, as the Associated Press reported, he struck a different tone: “My view is that we agree with this budget as it stands and (will) make it work for the operational necessity of the FBI, and as the head of the FBI, I was simply asking for more funds because I can do more with more money,” adding that he would “make the mission work on whatever budget we’re given.” Senator Jeff Merkley pressed the contradiction — “So you support the budget presented that cuts half a billion but you also support us adding $1 billion should we choose to do that?” — and Patel answered, “Well I can’t not support the budget as proposed because then I would be supporting no budget,” as the AP reported the exchange.
The oversight questioning ran alongside the numbers. Senator Chris Coons noted the committee still had only the administration’s “skinny budget” rather than a full FBI request, and raised the Justice Department grant cuts alongside it. Coons also pressed Patel on the removal of New York field office head James Dennehy and on discipline tied to January 6 case assignments, returning to Patel’s confirmation pledge; Patel answered, in Coons’s office’s transcript of the exchange: “no one on any list will be punished at the FBI. As someone who was given case assignments I didn’t want many times over, you don’t get punished for your case assignments. You only get punished if you didn’t do the job and fail to follow the ethical guidelines and break the law, and that’s the standard.” On the 1,300-position figure from his House testimony, Patel added the nuance that employees who had taken the administration’s deferred-resignation “fork in the road” had filled much of that number, as the C-SPAN transcript of the hearing records.
Why it matters
Patel’s two budget days in May 2025 are the paired record of an agency head arguing against his own administration’s number in one chamber and for it in the other — House members, including Rep. Rosa DeLauro, put the $11.1 billion figure on the record, and the Senate hearing is where Patel reconciled it with the President’s proposal. His no-punishment-for-case-assignments answer here, like his May 12, 2026 “targeting no journalists” statement a year later, became a benchmark later oversight hearings quoted back to him.
Scoreboard watch
This is a candidate item for the weekly scoreboard: Patel’s May 8, 2025 appropriations testimony — his “make the mission work on whatever budget we’re given” position against his May 7 House testimony seeking $11.1 billion, and his no-punishment pledge for January 6 case assignments — each as stated at the hearing, to be checked against the enacted fiscal 2026 FBI appropriation and the Bureau’s subsequent personnel actions.
Sources: Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies, hearing on the fiscal 2026 budget request for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, May 8, 2025 (full hearing as carried by CBS News, embedded above); Associated Press, May 8, 2025, on the House–Senate contrast and the Merkley exchange; Senator Chris Coons’s office, May 2025, transcript of his questioning; C-SPAN transcript of the May 8, 2025 hearing. All figures and characterizations as stated by Director Patel and committee members at the hearing.
On this page